Why i will be Convinced that Anna Ardin is a Liar 2020

Why i will be Convinced that Anna Ardin is a Liar 2020

I will be slightly upgrading and reposting this from 2012 as the main-stream media have actually ensured extremely people that are few the information of this “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought to never have now been arrested within the united kingdom in the beginning while there is no situation, with no genuine research. Check this out and you also shall know why.

One other thing perhaps perhaps not commonly grasped will there be isn’t any JURY in a rape test in Sweden which is a SECRET TEST. Every one of the proof, all the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no news. Truly the only general public component is the charging and also the verdict. There was a judge and two advisers straight appointed by political events. Which means you never ever would get to comprehend just just exactly how plainly the situation is just a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.

You will find therefore inconsistencies that are many Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. However the key question which leaps away at me personally – and which strangely We have perhaps not seen asked anywhere else – is it:

Why did Anna Ardin maybe maybe not alert Sofia Wilen?

On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood into the Swedish group around Assange for the shocking pink cashmere sweater she had used within the front row of Assange’s press conference. Anna Ardin knew Assange had been likely to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a pal who was simply searching for Assange:

“He’s not right here. He’s planned to own sex using the girl that is cashmere night, yet not caused it to be. Possibly he finally discovered time yesterday? ”

Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days previously, on 13 August, she was in fact intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she had been ready to take to (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s entire life. She has also been to convey that this attack included enforced non-safe sex and she had been concerned with HIV.

If Ardin really thought that on 13 August Assange had forced unsafe sex she make no attempt to warn Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in danger of her life on her and this could have transmitted HIV, why did? And exactly why ended up being Ardin talking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about any of it to buddies, without any disapproval that is evident discouragement?

Ardin had Wilen’s contact information as well as had organised her enrollment for the press meeting. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.

Let’s fit that into a tremendously brief survey regarding the entire relationship that is ardin/Assange.

11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for a press seminar organised by way of a branch for the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat as she will be away for him to stay in.

13 August: Ardin comes home early. look these up She’s got supper with Assange as well as have actually consensual intercourse, regarding the day that is first of. Ardin afterwards alleges this changed into attack by surreptitious mutilation for the condom.

14 August: Anna volunteers to behave as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him in the dais at their press meeting. Assange fulfills Sofia Wilen here.

‘Julian desires to head to a party that is crayfish anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’

This make an effort to look for a party that is crayfish, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early morning. Another provides to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick to me. ”

15 August Nevertheless during the crayfish party with Julian, Anna tweets:

‘Sitting outside at 02:00 and barely freezing using the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’

Julian and Anna, based on both their authorities testimonies, rest once more in identical solitary sleep, and continue doing so for the following day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have sexual intercourse; Anna tells police they just do not. That Anna and Julian go together to, and leave together from, a dinner with the leadership of the Pirate Party evening. They again sleep into the bed that is same.

16 August: Julian would go to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin will not warn her of prospective assault that is sexual. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once more declines.

20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say she actually is focused on STD’s including HIV after non-safe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other Social Democrat user, previous colleague on a single ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist officer, Irmeli Krans. Ardin tells Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to just just take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s unrecorded – in breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration accusing Assange of rape. Wilen will not signal it.

21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had sex that is unprotected her eight times formerly.

Some times later on: Ardin creates a broken condom into the authorities as proof; however a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA about it, as well as it’s evidently unused.

No witness has arrived forward to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s Ardin-arranged interview with Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead to not grumble of a attack, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration alleging rape, that has been used by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.

It is ordinary any particular one of a couple of things took place:


Ardin was intimately assaulted with non-safe sex, but did not alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.

Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, come in general general general public and personal with him, behave as his press assistant, and rest in identical sleep with him, refusing duplicated provides to allow for him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.


Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after providing him making use of her one sleep flat while she had been away. By her very own admission, she had sex that is consensual him, within hours of fulfilling him.

She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and appears at the very least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after unsafe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning friend that is feminist policewoman Irmeli Krans, so that you can twist Wilen’s tale into a sexual assault – quite easy given Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape legislation. Wilen refused to signal.

During the authorities section on 20 August, Wilen texted a pal at 14.25 “did not need to place any costs against JA nevertheless the authorities desired to get a handle on him. ”

At 17.26 she texted that she had been “shocked if they arrested JA because we just desired him to have a test”.

The evening that is next 22.22 she texted “it was the authorities whom fabricated the charges”.

Ardin then comprised her very own tale of intimate attack. As a lot of buddies knew she ended up being making love with Assange, she could maybe not claim sex that is non-consensual. So she manufactured her tale to fit right in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the affair associated with torn condom. However the torn condom she produced doesn’t have trace of Assange onto it. It really is impractical to wear a condom and never keep a DNA trace.


No difficulty is had by me in stating that We securely think Ardin to be always a liar. On her tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior that is, when you look at the sense that is literal amazing.

Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you had been never ever designed to see all this work detail. Rape studies in Sweden take place totally in key. There is absolutely no jury, additionally the national government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental events. If Assange would go to Sweden, he’ll fade away into jail, the test will likely to be key, while the the next thing you are going to hear is that he is bad and a rapist.

Next, needless to say, no matter evidence is really poor, as merely to cry rape would be to tarnish a reputation that is man’s. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in destroying a lot of the work and life of Assange. The important points regarding the whole tale being pathetic is unimportant.

By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line that it’s incorrect also to consider the data. That she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro groups in Havana and Miami if you are not allowed to know who the accuser is, how can you find out?

Finally, to those helpful idiots whom declare that how you can test these things is with in court, i might state needless to say, you may be appropriate, we must trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, and we also should definitely condemn the behaviour that is disgraceful of whom campaigned when it comes to Birmingham Six.